Latest topics
» Adaptations for Renaissance Period?by MJ1 Today at 9:37 am
» Finally a kriegsspiel on the PC? Gettysburg: Scourge of War review
by Martin Yesterday at 9:38 am
» 2012 Events
by hammurabi70 Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:14 pm
» Some interesting posts regarding orders in the ACW
by Blaugrana Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:37 am
» "The Original Wargame" A Critical Edition of Baron von Reisswitz’s 1824 Prussian “Instructions” William N. Vossbrink
by Martin Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:42 am
» More Russian military topographical maps
by Martin Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:07 pm
» The next few UK games
by Martin Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:23 pm
» VASSAL System
by Ike Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:56 pm
» Gettysburg Scourge of War - Team Speak 3
by Martin Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:51 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:01 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:53 am
» General outline of the game...
by MJ1 Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:32 am
Statistics
We have 156 registered usersThe newest registered user is Mick A
Our users have posted a total of 1347 messages in 212 subjects
Log in
Representing units
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Representing units
Hello,
I was wondering, how did you represent the troops in this scenario (American War of Independence Kriegsspiel, 1777), or any other scenarios described on the Kriegsspiel website?
F.e. Sullivan has the 1st Maryland Infantry Brigade 800 men -> are that 2 half-batallion blocks?
What about the Light Dragoons (80 troopers) -> 1 cavalry block? (which actually represents 150 riders?)
I don't understand how the unit front sizes match your map scale ?
Regards!
I was wondering, how did you represent the troops in this scenario (American War of Independence Kriegsspiel, 1777), or any other scenarios described on the Kriegsspiel website?
F.e. Sullivan has the 1st Maryland Infantry Brigade 800 men -> are that 2 half-batallion blocks?
What about the Light Dragoons (80 troopers) -> 1 cavalry block? (which actually represents 150 riders?)
I don't understand how the unit front sizes match your map scale ?
Regards!
stoffelbier- Posts: 18
Join date: 2009-07-23
Re: Representing units
There are two ways to solve this:
1) Research the proper frontage and make units that fit that frontage on your map scale.
2) (This is what I do!
) Find out the approximate frontage, and between that, the units you have, the maps you have, and the battle you want to portray.... declare a given troop block to be a given size of unit. For example, if I'm running a fight on the full-scale Metz map section, one infantry block is a battalion. If I'm running it on the Metz index map (which mets me fight a big battle on a wide area, yet use a manageable map), the sme troop block is declared to be a brigade.
Rationales and Excuses Department:
In my opinion, the point of Kriegsspiel is to create, for the players, a situation in which they have very limited information, and very limited time in which to make decisions, and to require them to express those decisions in a manner understandable to another person (other players or the umpires). Speed of play is more important than precise simulation because rapid execution of the bounds creates the limited time for players to ponder.
Therefore, when setting up and running a game, I tend to ruthlessly simplify the system. When I'm *not* running a game, I will read and pay close attention to all of Reisswitz's (et al.'s) detailed sets of modifiers for various situations, to try to ensure my simplifications are preserving the essence of the time period. But, if it takes more than a few seconds to look something up while running a game, I default straight to the MSU method: Make Stuff Up -- trying to make use of my best understanding of the rules while doing so, but opting for speed of play uber alles.
1) Research the proper frontage and make units that fit that frontage on your map scale.
2) (This is what I do!
Rationales and Excuses Department:
In my opinion, the point of Kriegsspiel is to create, for the players, a situation in which they have very limited information, and very limited time in which to make decisions, and to require them to express those decisions in a manner understandable to another person (other players or the umpires). Speed of play is more important than precise simulation because rapid execution of the bounds creates the limited time for players to ponder.
Therefore, when setting up and running a game, I tend to ruthlessly simplify the system. When I'm *not* running a game, I will read and pay close attention to all of Reisswitz's (et al.'s) detailed sets of modifiers for various situations, to try to ensure my simplifications are preserving the essence of the time period. But, if it takes more than a few seconds to look something up while running a game, I default straight to the MSU method: Make Stuff Up -- trying to make use of my best understanding of the rules while doing so, but opting for speed of play uber alles.
James Sterrett- Posts: 54
Join date: 2009-01-05
Similar topics» World War 1: Researching Canadian Soldiers and Units of the CEF
» Midwife led units
» Maoists to declare autonomous federal units from December 11
» WW II Canadian Helmets
» Brad Conway Resigns 8/16/10
» Midwife led units
» Maoists to declare autonomous federal units from December 11
» WW II Canadian Helmets
» Brad Conway Resigns 8/16/10
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum