Latest topics
» Teamspeak Overlay Tutorial
by Leffe7 Yesterday at 3:39 pm

» Suggested game improvements
by Blaugrana Yesterday at 12:17 pm

» Friday 18th May 19:30 UK time
by Mr. Digby Fri May 18, 2012 6:15 pm

» Speeding-up our face to face k/spiels
by MJ1 Tue May 15, 2012 9:25 pm

» Tuesday, 15th May, 19h30 UK time
by Mr. Digby Tue May 15, 2012 6:48 pm

» Monday 14th May 19:30 UK time
by Uncle Billy Tue May 15, 2012 2:16 pm

» MP Scenario 3: Falling into a trap (26th may)
by Martin Mon May 14, 2012 2:03 pm

» Scenario 3 (Saturday, 26th May, 1930 UK time)
by Leffe7 Sun May 13, 2012 3:11 pm

» Hi from Italy!
by Blaugrana Sat May 12, 2012 12:25 pm

» Thursday 10th May 19:30 UK time
by Mr. Digby Wed May 09, 2012 11:39 pm

» Campaign discussion
by MJ1 Wed May 09, 2012 7:35 pm

» UK Summer Game - Please Follow Link and say when is best for you!! - WW2 Normandy 1944
by Martin Tue May 08, 2012 8:07 pm

Statistics
We have 176 registered users
The newest registered user is Isacco

Our users have posted a total of 2239 messages in 304 subjects
Log in

I forgot my password


Though one: point values

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Thanks Ike

Post  PeterPerla on Thu May 19, 2011 1:24 pm

Thank you for your response. I appreciate it.
Take care
Peter

PeterPerla

Posts: 5
Join date: 2011-04-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Though one: point values

Post  hammurabi70 on Sat May 28, 2011 7:30 am

PeterPerla wrote: My original reading of the rules was that you took a half-battalion off the board if it suffered casualties equal to half its strength, that is, 45 of 90 points.

In addition, the ability of the infantry to deploy skirmish platoons makes me wonder how you handle that as well. If my half-battalion deploys its two skirmishers, do you reduce its firepower relative to the tabled results, or do you, as I think I understand the rules, leave its firepower unreduced, on the basis of the fact that really only the first two ranks fired effectively? Peter


As I understood it one of the reasons that the British were famed in the Napoleonic Wars for their two ranks rather than three ranks was they so often fought when campaign casualties had reduced troop numbers that could not be replaced but they still deployed on the usual frontage.
On that basis I:
(1) Prefer to mark casualties to a unit but do not reduce the area it occupies
(2) Maintain the fire-effect irrespective of early casualties (in the mode of detaching skirmishers)
(3) Make under-strength units brittle so they collapse suddenly in respect of casualties (not very original but I'll go with received wisdom!)

hammurabi70

Posts: 170
Join date: 2008-12-09
Location: London

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum