Latest topics
» Adaptations for Renaissance Period?by MJ1 Today at 9:37 am
» Finally a kriegsspiel on the PC? Gettysburg: Scourge of War review
by Martin Yesterday at 9:38 am
» 2012 Events
by hammurabi70 Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:14 pm
» Some interesting posts regarding orders in the ACW
by Blaugrana Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:37 am
» "The Original Wargame" A Critical Edition of Baron von Reisswitz’s 1824 Prussian “Instructions” William N. Vossbrink
by Martin Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:42 am
» More Russian military topographical maps
by Martin Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:07 pm
» The next few UK games
by Martin Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:23 pm
» VASSAL System
by Ike Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:56 pm
» Gettysburg Scourge of War - Team Speak 3
by Martin Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:51 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:01 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:53 am
» General outline of the game...
by MJ1 Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:32 am
Statistics
We have 156 registered usersThe newest registered user is Mick A
Our users have posted a total of 1347 messages in 212 subjects
Log in
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
I have been reading of some of the opening battles of the Franco-Prussian War and would like to try to replicate some of the small engagements. As Richard Clarke points out in the Foreward the rules address both sides, red and blue, as Prussian forces, what remedies can anyone point out to replicate the French forces? Some items to be addressed:
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
Pete Maidhof- Posts: 23
Join date: 2008-12-21
Re: Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
One of the difficulties of dealing with the technological upgrading of the C19.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.

hammurabi70- Posts: 169
Join date: 2008-12-09
Location: London
Similar topics» Sammy Franco-Choke out (Martial Arts )
» The immoral oppressive Prussian education system
» The Predictable End of 'Prussian Blue'
» NYLAH FRANCO-TORREZ - 3 yo - San Bernardino CA
» Bárbara Franco (PORTUGAL 2011)
» The immoral oppressive Prussian education system
» The Predictable End of 'Prussian Blue'
» NYLAH FRANCO-TORREZ - 3 yo - San Bernardino CA
» Bárbara Franco (PORTUGAL 2011)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum