Latest topics
» Friday 18th May 19:30 UK timeby Mr. Digby Today at 6:15 pm
» Teamspeak Overlay Tutorial
by Mr. Digby Yesterday at 5:17 pm
» Speeding-up our face to face k/spiels
by MJ1 Tue May 15, 2012 9:25 pm
» Tuesday, 15th May, 19h30 UK time
by Mr. Digby Tue May 15, 2012 6:48 pm
» Monday 14th May 19:30 UK time
by Uncle Billy Tue May 15, 2012 2:16 pm
» MP Scenario 3: Falling into a trap (26th may)
by Martin Mon May 14, 2012 2:03 pm
» Scenario 3 (Saturday, 26th May, 1930 UK time)
by Leffe7 Sun May 13, 2012 3:11 pm
» Hi from Italy!
by Blaugrana Sat May 12, 2012 12:25 pm
» Thursday 10th May 19:30 UK time
by Mr. Digby Wed May 09, 2012 11:39 pm
» Campaign discussion
by MJ1 Wed May 09, 2012 7:35 pm
» UK Summer Game - Please Follow Link and say when is best for you!! - WW2 Normandy 1944
by Martin Tue May 08, 2012 8:07 pm
» MP Scenario1: The attack on Iuka (5th may)
by Martin Tue May 08, 2012 7:53 pm
Statistics
We have 176 registered usersThe newest registered user is Isacco
Our users have posted a total of 2236 messages in 304 subjects
Log in
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
I have been reading of some of the opening battles of the Franco-Prussian War and would like to try to replicate some of the small engagements. As Richard Clarke points out in the Foreward the rules address both sides, red and blue, as Prussian forces, what remedies can anyone point out to replicate the French forces? Some items to be addressed:
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.
The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.
The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.
Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.
Any thoughts on how to apply to K/S?
Thanks,
Pete
Pete Maidhof- Posts: 23
Join date: 2008-12-21
Re: Franco-Prussian War using von Tschischwitz Kriegsspiel 1862
One of the difficulties of dealing with the technological upgrading of the C19.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French Chassepot was apparently state of the art, while the Dreyse needle gun was a somewhat older design.[/q]
Assess impact of French fire and implement prior to the Germans.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The French had the Mitrailleuse "machine gun", but was organized along artillery lines, often not being in position to be effectively employed.[/q]
Have them deploy in the artillery lines and fire up to 2k with weak effect.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]The Prussian artillery was breech loading and had a greater rate of fire versus the mussle loading french guns.[/q]
Grade with different result factors. I think the key problem was the two-set range fuses used by the French artillery. Like the Mitrailleuse the effect should be weak while the German artillery should be much more effective and, I think, have a greater range.
[quote="Pete Maidhof"]Opposite the Saar, the French downright neglect of using cavalry to screen and/or gain/maintain contact with enemy forces arriving to their front.[/q]
(1) Cavalry cannot detach troop markers for patrols
(2) Limit how far they can move from infantry
I know these are general guidelines rather than specific instructions but if you want to adapt the originals it depends on how you view these effects rather than having clear changes.

hammurabi70- Posts: 170
Join date: 2008-12-09
Location: London
Similar topics» Sammy Franco-Choke out (Martial Arts )
» The immoral oppressive Prussian education system
» The Predictable End of 'Prussian Blue'
» NYLAH FRANCO-TORREZ - 3 yo - San Bernardino CA
» Bárbara Franco (PORTUGAL 2011)
» The immoral oppressive Prussian education system
» The Predictable End of 'Prussian Blue'
» NYLAH FRANCO-TORREZ - 3 yo - San Bernardino CA
» Bárbara Franco (PORTUGAL 2011)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum