Latest topics
» Adaptations for Renaissance Period?by MJ1 Today at 9:37 am
» Finally a kriegsspiel on the PC? Gettysburg: Scourge of War review
by Martin Yesterday at 9:38 am
» 2012 Events
by hammurabi70 Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:14 pm
» Some interesting posts regarding orders in the ACW
by Blaugrana Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:37 am
» "The Original Wargame" A Critical Edition of Baron von Reisswitz’s 1824 Prussian “Instructions” William N. Vossbrink
by Martin Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:42 am
» More Russian military topographical maps
by Martin Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:07 pm
» The next few UK games
by Martin Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:23 pm
» VASSAL System
by Ike Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:56 pm
» Gettysburg Scourge of War - Team Speak 3
by Martin Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:51 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:01 pm
» Real-time multiplayer online Kriegsspiels
by King_Rufus Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:53 am
» General outline of the game...
by MJ1 Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:32 am
Statistics
We have 156 registered usersThe newest registered user is Mick A
Our users have posted a total of 1347 messages in 212 subjects
Log in
Using Cameras to depict events
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Using Cameras to depict events
Discussion copied from Yahoo Kriegsspiel Group
=================================================================
> I'm using the Marzell maps from kriegsspiel.org.uk. I will need
> to find some way to mark up these maps with unit positions and
> distribute the resulting files to the players (of course each
> player will need their own map containing only what they can
> see).
Digital camera?
I play my PBEM games with figures once the units get into
range, and I just take pictures of the battlefield from a low
angle. (I then use MSPaint to label things to help them
orientate themselves a bit, and to rub out bits they can't
see.)
Taking a picture of your map would at least be quick. Rub out
in MSPaint things not in line of sight.
Sure they might not be able to read the photos 100% properly,
but that adds the necessary "fog". You could even angle it so
that the "nearest" bits are clearer than the "furtherest" bits.
It would give an impression of where things are that no amount
of map reading achieves, which I presume it what you want.
Mark Plant
=================================================================
I have been interested to read comments about cameras. For suitable
quality digital pictures I would guess you need something more than a
portrait camera in order to get detail of units or figures rather
than just a bland impression. Can anyone comment on suitable
equipment?
Chris Russell
=================================================================
This is fairly typical.
http://pygmy-wars.50megs.com/scenarios/rauna/Freikorps0720.JPG
(By the time the player "saw" this the units had disappeared
from view, so the arrows depict the movement.)
Note, unfortunately the above link is broken, but I can recommend Marks Site http://pygmy-wars.50megs.com and below is a picture he provided for me when I participated in one of his PBEM campaigns.

You are not trying to give accuracy, merely an impression of
the relative "look" of things. If they can't quite make out the
details, so much the better. (I assumed that you would be
taking pictures of either blocks or cut-out cardboard on a map
-- using figures and terrain on a board for KS is good fun, but
not compatible with a job).
The thing about taking photos is that it is very little work --
since the umpire already has to have the map moves done
regardless. Whereas setting things up on a drawing program is
too tedious to ever do on a regular basis.
Cheers,
Mark Plant
=================================================================
G'day Mark
This of course begs the questions
What MegaPixel rating
What Optical zoom
and what sort of Macro does it have?
Remind me how you do the arrows/labels et al.
Also - from the photo - where do you get you buildings?
Cheers David Nicolz
=================================================================
It's a Ricoh Caplio RR230. 2 MegaPixels. (I'm not kidding when
I say most phones are better these days.)
3 x optical zoom. The zoom is not an issue for me with KS -- I
need the widest angle possible for the table.
It has a macro, but I don't use it except for the odd close-up
of a unit. If I can I find someone with a better camera to do
it for me.
>
> Remind me how you do the arrows/labels et al.
Done in MSPaint. It's very nasty but quick and easy.
I use GIMP for my better stuff, but not when I'm in a hurry.
>
> Also - from the photo - where do you get you buildings?
>
Handmade and cast in resin. I decided to go the N-scale/12mm
route for terrain and no-one made Russian cottages in that
scale then. (Now TimeScale make a few excellent ones.)
Cheers,
Mark Plant
=================================================================
Very interesting but it does make the point that if you want crisp
detail you need a more specialised camera - this is OK, if not
advantageous in giving a genaeral indication w/o detail and that
might be better for a Krieggsspiel purpose but I had in mind getting
detail on a figure.
Chris Russell
=================================================================
=================================================================
> I'm using the Marzell maps from kriegsspiel.org.uk. I will need
> to find some way to mark up these maps with unit positions and
> distribute the resulting files to the players (of course each
> player will need their own map containing only what they can
> see).
Digital camera?
I play my PBEM games with figures once the units get into
range, and I just take pictures of the battlefield from a low
angle. (I then use MSPaint to label things to help them
orientate themselves a bit, and to rub out bits they can't
see.)
Taking a picture of your map would at least be quick. Rub out
in MSPaint things not in line of sight.
Sure they might not be able to read the photos 100% properly,
but that adds the necessary "fog". You could even angle it so
that the "nearest" bits are clearer than the "furtherest" bits.
It would give an impression of where things are that no amount
of map reading achieves, which I presume it what you want.
Mark Plant
=================================================================
I have been interested to read comments about cameras. For suitable
quality digital pictures I would guess you need something more than a
portrait camera in order to get detail of units or figures rather
than just a bland impression. Can anyone comment on suitable
equipment?
Chris Russell
=================================================================
This is fairly typical.
http://pygmy-wars.50megs.com/scenarios/rauna/Freikorps0720.JPG
(By the time the player "saw" this the units had disappeared
from view, so the arrows depict the movement.)
Note, unfortunately the above link is broken, but I can recommend Marks Site http://pygmy-wars.50megs.com and below is a picture he provided for me when I participated in one of his PBEM campaigns.

You are not trying to give accuracy, merely an impression of
the relative "look" of things. If they can't quite make out the
details, so much the better. (I assumed that you would be
taking pictures of either blocks or cut-out cardboard on a map
-- using figures and terrain on a board for KS is good fun, but
not compatible with a job).
The thing about taking photos is that it is very little work --
since the umpire already has to have the map moves done
regardless. Whereas setting things up on a drawing program is
too tedious to ever do on a regular basis.
Cheers,
Mark Plant
=================================================================
G'day Mark
This of course begs the questions
What MegaPixel rating
What Optical zoom
and what sort of Macro does it have?
Remind me how you do the arrows/labels et al.
Also - from the photo - where do you get you buildings?
Cheers David Nicolz
=================================================================
It's a Ricoh Caplio RR230. 2 MegaPixels. (I'm not kidding when
I say most phones are better these days.)
3 x optical zoom. The zoom is not an issue for me with KS -- I
need the widest angle possible for the table.
It has a macro, but I don't use it except for the odd close-up
of a unit. If I can I find someone with a better camera to do
it for me.
>
> Remind me how you do the arrows/labels et al.
Done in MSPaint. It's very nasty but quick and easy.
I use GIMP for my better stuff, but not when I'm in a hurry.
>
> Also - from the photo - where do you get you buildings?
>
Handmade and cast in resin. I decided to go the N-scale/12mm
route for terrain and no-one made Russian cottages in that
scale then. (Now TimeScale make a few excellent ones.)
Cheers,
Mark Plant
=================================================================
Very interesting but it does make the point that if you want crisp
detail you need a more specialised camera - this is OK, if not
advantageous in giving a genaeral indication w/o detail and that
might be better for a Krieggsspiel purpose but I had in mind getting
detail on a figure.
Chris Russell
=================================================================
_________________
Webmaster at Kriegsspiel.org.uk
Similar topics» Calendar of Events - Case(s) Against Casey
» Whispers and Wishes - events and catering
» Cameras
» Tetley Tea Promotions & News Events
» Interesting reading in light of current events
» Whispers and Wishes - events and catering
» Cameras
» Tetley Tea Promotions & News Events
» Interesting reading in light of current events
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum