Latest topics
» Impromptu Games
by Miko77 Mon Aug 21, 2017 3:04 pm

» Can you see what it is yet?
by Mr. Digby Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:46 am

» Map Modding Q&A
by Mr. Digby Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:34 pm

» Army level rules?
by Tim Carne Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:12 pm

» Chancellorsville North map - Polish winter
by rschilla Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:37 pm

» 2017 k/spiel game schedule
by Martin Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:40 pm

» 30 Free Scenarios for Kickstarter backers of General Staff
by Dr Ezra Sidran Sun Aug 06, 2017 8:35 pm

» Crop sprites
by Didz Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:17 pm

» AARs - post here all after battle comments and replay files
by Miko77 Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:58 am

» KS Map Modding Project
by rschilla Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:23 am

» Chickamauga conversion to Germany
by Mr. Digby Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:04 am

» How to import scanned maps into the General Staff wargaming system.
by Dr Ezra Sidran Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:43 pm

Statistics
We have 970 registered users
The newest registered user is Eagle Tsui

Our users have posted a total of 23836 messages in 1909 subjects
Keywords

camera  stock  battles  scenario  maps  

Log in

I forgot my password


Rule change results

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Rule change results

Post  Father General on Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:44 am

PASS 1) With regards to the tactical map, the umpire will no longer set victory conditions or objectives for the sides. Both sides may remain engaged or disengage at will regardless of the general outcome of the skirmish. With regards to the strategic map, the ranking officer in the node will make the decision to move or remain.

FAIL 2) The umpire will distribute ancillary victor's spoils (promotions, special unit names, weapon upgrades) consistent with the score.

FAIL 3) As per the OOB, win/draw/loss application will be adjudicated by the umpire and WILL NOT be disclosed to the commanders.
avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Father General on Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:47 am

The failure of Amendments 2 and 3 means that the umpire will determine a victor based on personal discretion. (thanks you made my job extremely difficult... Evil or Very Mad )

Based on that determination, which may be extremely subjective, the umpire will distribute the ancillary victor's spoils.

Meanwhile, the passage of Amendment 1 means that the declaration of victory or defeat will not compel any commanders to move nodes post battle.

Thank you

-Neal
avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  M.Jonah on Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:18 am

Sadly i just think thats rediculous if a side losses the battle they should be compelled to retreat from the field because if a player wants to be obstinate then they could just say we are nopt moving and the campaign will not go anywhere and stagnate its already like a snail trying to cross a road covered in molasis.
avatar
M.Jonah

Posts : 92
Join date : 2012-10-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Mr. Digby on Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:10 am

Agree with Jonah. In a nodal map the winner holds the node, the loser must withdraw from it via any road the winner does not block.

This is pretty elementary to the system.

_________________
The other Martin - Charles Reille, le dernier Maréchal de France.

"Any hussar who has not got himself killed by the age of 30 is a jackass." - Antoine Charles Louis Lasalle, commander of Napoleon's light cavalry, killed in battle at Wagram 6 July 1809, aged 34.

"I had forgotten there was an objective." - Generallieutenant Mikhail Borozdin I
avatar
Mr. Digby

Posts : 4827
Join date : 2012-02-14
Age : 57
Location : UK Midlands

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Uncle Billy on Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:19 pm

I agree, the loser must withdraw. I believe Stefan and I both agreed that in instances where both sides are on the field at the end of the battle, still fighting or just starring across the field mooning one another, we use the newspaper headline to decide the winner and loser. Only if the game judged the fight inconclusive, would both sides remain in place.

_________________
I can make this march and I will make Georgia howl.
avatar
Uncle Billy

Posts : 2810
Join date : 2012-02-27
Location : western Colorado

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Father General on Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:35 pm

Uncle Billy wrote:I agree, the loser must withdraw. I believe Stefan and I both agreed that in instances where both sides are on the field at the end of the battle, still fighting or just starring across the field mooning one another, we use the newspaper headline to decide the winner and loser. Only if the game judged the fight inconclusive, would both sides remain in place.

If you gentlemen do not like the option, then you do not have to exercise it.

As per the rules, I will still declare a victor. What the corps commanders do, is now up to them.

How I pick the winner in a battle -- especially if I don't participate and I can't view the replay (yep, my replay function is broken) I have no idea at this moment. But I still have a day to figure it out, so no need to worry...
avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Martin on Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:00 pm

Uncle Billy wrote:I agree, the loser must withdraw. I believe Stefan and I both agreed that in instances where both sides are on the field at the end of the battle, still fighting or just starring across the field mooning one another, we use the newspaper headline to decide the winner and loser. Only if the game judged the fight inconclusive, would both sides remain in place.
I think it's right that the final decision on this has to be down to the umpire & corps commanders, or we'll be going round in circles forever. Glad I'm not one of them Very Happy

But isn't there a problem with relying on the game victory screen? I've certainly played a number of battles where the 'result' appears to bear no relation to the condition of the two armies. I can remember an occasion where one side put most of the enemy to flight, and as a result outnumbered their remaining troops by 4:1. The game nevertheless judged that side to have lost, because it suffered a couple of hundred more killed & wounded. I can only assume that's because the victory calculation takes little or no account of routed units. On that basis Lee & Jackson would have lost most battles in 1862.

I only mention this because In SP you just shrug it off. Will folks be happy to do that in MP I wonder?

Martin (J)

Martin

Posts : 2161
Join date : 2008-12-20
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Leffe7 on Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:45 pm

I agree that the Umpire shall declare a victor after the battle. This decision is to be used for the OOB calculation of losses (I prefered this to be a non-disclosed decision, but now its common knowledge). But as per rule change 1 "Both sides may remain engaged or disengage at will regardless of the general outcome of the skirmish."

IIRC Lee's campaign in the Peninsula consited of a series of battles, a lot of them had to be seen as a CSA defeat. But he kept attacking regardless.
avatar
Leffe7

Posts : 465
Join date : 2012-03-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Rule change results

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum