Latest topics
» ACW fight next Sunday
by Morsey Today at 3:46 pm

» Impromptu Games
by Morsey Today at 3:45 pm

» Patch and Interesting News from NSD
by Miko77 Today at 1:47 pm

» Set Up for SOWWL NAPOLEON GAMES For Kriegspiel style
by Mr. Digby Yesterday at 5:19 pm

» New, with a question
by Martin Yesterday at 9:11 am

» AARs - post here all after battle comments and replay files
by Mr. Digby Sat May 27, 2017 5:17 pm

» Boardgaming in Hertfordshire?
by King_Rufus Sat May 27, 2017 3:05 pm

» Another mini-campaign idea
by Mr. Digby Thu May 25, 2017 11:53 pm

» The Arny Design Module is ready for Beta Testing!
by Dr Ezra Sidran Wed May 24, 2017 4:39 pm

» 2017 k/spiel game schedule
by Martin Tue May 23, 2017 9:43 pm

» Fiddling around with an 18th century mod
by Uncle Billy Thu May 18, 2017 12:33 am

» SOW Scenario Generator
by Mr. Digby Wed May 17, 2017 6:02 pm

Statistics
We have 928 registered users
The newest registered user is Iron Shriek

Our users have posted a total of 23236 messages in 1878 subjects
Log in

I forgot my password


Chancellorsville your opinion?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Father General on Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:15 pm

How many of you have Chancellorsville?

Is it worth it?

Does it add a lot of value to what we already have?

I intend to make the buy if for no other reason to support NSD, however, my timing of the buy will depend on how much value you feel it adds.

How are the scenarios and maps?

Same features or improved?

-Neal
avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  WJPalmer on Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:43 pm

I have it and like it, although there hasn't been much opporunity to play more than a handful of SP games on it. For MP it has been difficult to play to date because there always seems to be the odd player who doesn't have it.

The maps have a very different look from Gburg & Antietam. I like them but have heard them called the entire range from "beautiful" to "ugly." IMO they do an outstanding job of recreating the aura of the Wilderness. In a few situations the game pathing has been difficult, but I don't have enough experience to offer an informed opinion on whether this is a widespread problem. The roads in C-ville work better than the they did with the initial release of Antietam. There are a few new terrain types and the breastworks/abatis defenses are killers. HITS play is/would be difficult especially in the western maps because of the Wilderness. Some will think this a problem, but there can be little doubt of its realism. It is easy to get confused once units go off-road.

The scenarios are fun to play and bring signficant teaching value. I was in the midst of Sears' "Chancellorsville" when the game came out so it was great to be able to "go there" almost in real time.

Bottom-line is that it would be a must have for the FG if for no other reason than to relive the glory of Jackson's attack on the Eleventh Corps! Laughing

avatar
WJPalmer

Posts : 526
Join date : 2012-08-10
Location : Colorado

http://rwberg53.wix.com/adventure-images

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Father General on Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:58 am

Okay, I bought it.

Let's just say it's a present from New Baby Brendan. He bought it for me, ya know, because it works that way, right??
avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Blackstreet on Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:24 am

WJPalmer wrote:
Bottom-line is that it would be a must have for the FG if for no other reason than to relive the glory of Jackson's attack on the Eleventh Corps! Laughing

Yeah, but Jackson had connection issues too, and dropped that game IIR. Too bad, it was going well for his team before that.
avatar
Blackstreet

Posts : 144
Join date : 2013-02-03
Age : 40
Location : Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Uncle Billy on Wed Feb 06, 2013 3:44 pm

These are excellent maps. Playing HITS it becomes obvious why the battles fought in those woods were so disjointed. I've played a number of SP battles where I thought I was in a position to do great damage to the enemy, only to have have him bring up an unseen force on my flank and destroy my command.

There are large sections of missing roads on some of the maps,though not quite as bad as the Antietam maps, but if you use the Hits&Couriers mod, the roads are fully functional.

_________________
I can make this march and I will make Georgia howl.
avatar
Uncle Billy

Posts : 2657
Join date : 2012-02-27
Location : western Colorado

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  kg little mac on Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:23 pm

IMHO, the Chancellorsville maps are really ugly.

Something about the ground color is off-putting to me.
avatar
kg little mac

Posts : 430
Join date : 2012-07-09
Age : 58
Location : Eden

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  MajorByrd on Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:06 am

The trees and ground are incredibly ugly.

Stuff on it doesn't work - quite appaling releasing something like that and calling it a product.
avatar
MajorByrd

Posts : 232
Join date : 2012-07-30

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Father General on Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:20 am

I like it. It's a real confusing morass of a game -- insofar as I have played.

There are several spots on the map I could use for battles. However, I agree the price point is a bit steep, likely due to Matrix taking their cut. I hope NSD does well with sales and is able to reinvest some of those profits into further improvements. I love NSD!

I hope more of you will get the game soon. I'd like to try some MP on it sometime. For now, i do not intend to incorporate it into the new campaign until more folks have it.

Install went smoothly too, a bonus.

-Neal

avatar
Father General

Posts : 913
Join date : 2012-03-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Mr. Digby on Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:32 pm

Strange how different folks see the same product. I think they are beautiful maps. While the ground textures could be better I wouldn't say they were ugly. The Wilderness portions though do suffer from a lack of ground cover, grasses, underbrush, saplings and the like which would be prevalent. The baldness of the ground in the woods is the main problem but covering the whole map in the equivalent of crops like some areas of the Gettysburg maps would do a lot of harm to frame rates probably.

I did note many mistakes with the placing of buildings, and like the Gettysburg maps the placing of the railroad track sections is horrible. NSD need to find a new means of representing or laying RR track!

_________________
The other Martin - Charles Reille, le dernier Maréchal de France.

"Any hussar who has not got himself killed by the age of 30 is a jackass." - Antoine Charles Louis Lasalle, commander of Napoleon's light cavalry, killed in battle at Wagram 6 July 1809, aged 34.

"I had forgotten there was an objective." - Generallieutenant Mikhail Borozdin I
avatar
Mr. Digby

Posts : 4657
Join date : 2012-02-14
Age : 57
Location : UK Midlands

Back to top Go down

Re: Chancellorsville your opinion?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum